trauma
Wrist fracture
An elderly female with a complex medical history including CHF, atrial fibrillation and diabetes presented to the ER after a fall with complaints of pain in her right wrist. On exam, her right wrist was grossly distorted. Her xray is above. She was taken to the operating room urgently by the Orthopedic Surgeon for repair.
Orbital Fracture
Facial injury with orbital fracture
43 year old male was brought as a trauma patient after a motor vehicle accident. He sustained multiple facial fractures including left orbital fracture (see image above).
Flail Chest
Multiple rib fractures with a flail chest segment
The upper image is a 3-D reconstruction of the chest of the patient who was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The arrows are pointing to the rib fracture sites. Several ribs were broken in two or more places creating a flail chest segment with a paradoxical chest movement. Considering the extent of the ribs fractures, the patient was taken to OR for a chest wall stabilization (image below).
Traumatic Pneumonectomy
Traumatic Pneumonectomy
27 year old male came as a trauma patient after he was involved in a high speed car crash. He sustained bilateral pulmonary contusions and right hemopneumothorax. He continued to bleed from his right chest. He was taken to OR for thoracotomy.
Intraoperatively, he was found to have severe right lung damage. Pneumonectomy (lung removal) had to be performed to prevent exsanguination.
On a Chest XR above please note complete absence of the right lung as well as the evidence of thoracotomy.
Bilateral Acetabular Fractures
Bilateral Acetabular Fractures
56 year old male came as trauma patient after he was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The patient was intoxicated with alcohol at the time of the accident. CT pelvis with a 3-D reconstruction revealed bilateral acetabular fractures. (see arrows above)
The patient underwent orthopedic stabilization of his fractures.
Implantable bone growth stimulator.
Implantable bone growth stimulator.
The patient with a thoracic spine injury and a complete cord transsection at T8-9 level was taken to surgery for spine stabilization. After the spinal instrumentation, bone growth stimulator was implanted by the neurosurgeon (see image above).
Bone growth stimulators apply a direct electrical current to the fracture site promoting new bone formation and fracture healing.
Bone growth stimulator are indicated for the patients with who are at high risk for spinal fusion failure when any of the following criteria is met:
1. One or more failed fusions
2. Grade II or worse spondylolisthesis
3. A multiple level fusion entailing 3 or more vertebrae (e.g., L3 to L5, L4 to S1, etc.),
4. One or more of the following risk factors for fusion failure are present, gross obesity (BMI greater than 40), current smoking, diabetes, renal disease, active alcoholism;
Trauma patients with no insurance have a higher mortality.
Recent study published in the Archives of Surgery indicates that uninsured patients have an 80% higher chance of dying from trauma. This is shocking. Is it surprising? Yes, I would say it is. There could be some methodological issues with the study, but I am not going to dispute the results. Assuming this is true, why would the patients with no insurance have a much higher mortality from trauma? I am involved in caring for the trauma patients and we do not base our treatment decisions based on the insurance status. Regardless of the insurance, the patients get the studies, surgical procedures and medical treatment they need. We do not discharge patients earlier just because there is no insurance. The follow-up care maybe is different for the uninsured. I cannot imagine, though, that this would affect the mortality so much.
What about the pre-Hospital treatment? We know that paramedics do not ask for insurance. ER could not refuse the patient as well. Once evaluated in ER, the patient would be admitted to a Trauma Center. I have never heard of somebody being refused an admission to a Trauma Center for the lack of insurance (assuming the patient needs admission for medical reasons). Maybe I just live in an ‘ideal world’.
I wonder if there is a difference in the preexisting conditions between insured and uninsured. If the patient has poorly controlled diabetes, hypertension or coronary artery disease that would, definitively, affect the mortality. This brings us to a healthcare reform debate and we are not going to go there yet.
Also, I wonder if there is a difference in the severity of trauma between two groups of patients. The study should adjust for it, though. It would be interesting to see if there was a difference in the average alcohol level between those patients as well. Just from my personal experience – a lot of people who decide to drive while drunk are not very concerned about having medical insurance either. Though, this is just an observation.
Thoracic spine injury
This was a very unfortunate case.
The patient was involved in a rollover motor vehicle accident. CT spine revealed thoracic spine injury at T4 and T9 levels.
Despite a high dose intravenous steroids per spinal cord injury protocol and subsequent surgical stabilization, the patient remained paraplegic (weak in both lower extremities).
Traumatic pneumothorax
37 year old male presented as a trauma patient after motor vehicle accident. CT chest revealed left pneumothorax. Chest tube was inserted.
IVC filters for trauma patients - where is the happy medium?
Let’s talk about IVC filers in trauma patients. We all know the guidelines: Trauma patients with high risk for Venous Thromboembolism (severe head injury, spinal cord injury, LE fractures) should get a filter, right? Unfortunately, it’s not all that easy to decide in the real world practice who should get a filter. Some trauma patients are not eligible to be started on prophylactic anticoagulation, and are not “sick enough” to get a filter. Some patients get all they can get prophylaxis (TEDs, SCDs, even low dose Lovenox/Fragmin), yet still develop DVT (leg clots) and PE (emboli to lungs). Often it becomes a judgment call based on the expectations of the patient’s recovery. Having an option of placing a retrievable filter makes this decision somewhat easier – you can remove the filter later in necessary. Do I think that more trauma patients should get filters? No I don’t. The procedure itself has it’s own risks and once the filter is in, it can cause problems down the road (migration, vessel wall perforation etc.). Having more extensive guidelines on IVC filters might help in an everyday practice.
