Leukemia Treatment and Metabolic Syndrome
Recently I had a young man, who was an AML survivor, present with a triglyceride level of 5800. Usually, my first thought would be that there was a genetic abnormality leading to ineffective cholesterol metabolism. But, I was aware of breast cancer survivors being at risk for dyslipidemia and I began to wonder about leukemics. I then went on a literature search. What I found was quite interesting.
AML has a cure rate of nearly 97%. Therefore, most patients who get it live to tell about it. In terms of what their mortality is after their cure, the literature shows it is divided between heart disease and new malignancies.
In terms of heart disease, they are at risk from dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome. Even more interesting is that patients who have had a bone marrow transplant are particularly at risk. In a review article from the journal "Bone Marrow Transplantation"( Majhail et al. June 2008), 86 bone marrow transplant patients were followed. 49% of them were found to have metabolic syndrome. The rate of hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia was significantly higher in them as well. Therefore, I have hypothesized that this young man's high triglyceride level was related to his bone marrow transplant.
The patient and his family ended up calling his transplant center and they agreed that this is a known potential side effect.
I think this case points to the importance of primary care follow up of all cancer survivors. Often cancer patients have to deal with so many issues regarding their cancer that regular primary care issues take the back burner. They take the back burner, that is, until these regular primary care issues land them in the hospital!
Thank you for your comments. I will forward your request to the author of the original post.
Thank you for your comment and for my clerical error. I believe my intention was up to 80% for cure rate for AML.
As far as cancers that do have an 97% cure rate, those would include stage IA melanoma, papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma in young people and early prostate cancer with radical prostactectomy.
Best wishes for the continued health of your child who is a pediatric AML survivor. I totally agree with you that both Internal Medicine doctors and Family Medicine doctors should receive training in Survivorship. It is a very important lesson.
Please check your data on survival rates for AML. I believe overall rates of NED 5 years post-diagnosis are closer to 45%, although given the fairly new system of risk stratification, long-term survival rates vary depending on subtype. (I believe APL, aka AML M3, is close to 80%.)
No cancer--including the most treatable cancers such as pediatric ALL and Hodgkins lymphoma--is 97% curable. This sends a misleading message to the general public, and healthcare professionals unfamiliar with oncology, regarding the actual impact of cancer.
However, I do want to thank you for your support of long-term followup for cancer survivors. As the parent of a pediatric AML survivor, I daily live with concerns regarding my child's future health.
I'd like to propose a new Family Practice subspecialty: Survivorship Medicine. Practitioners would be trained to be aware of potential late effects from pediatric or adult cancer treatment and know when to refer to specialists to effectively treat (and track!) the late effects.
Thank you!